SARS-COV-2 Infection in Children and Young People in Bulgaria - A Prospective, Single-Center, Cohort Study

Compared to other respiratory viruses, the proportion of hospitalizations due to SARS-CoV-2 among children is relatively low. While severe illness is not common among children and young individuals, a particular type of severe condition called multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) has been reported. The aim of this prospective cohort study, which followed a group of individuals under the age of 19, was to examine the characteristics of patients who had contracted SARS-CoV-2, including their coexisting medical conditions, clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, and outcomes. The study also aimed to investigate the features of children who met the WHO case definition of MIS-C, as well as those who required intensive care. A total of 270 patients were included between March 2020 and December 2021. The eligible criteria were individuals between 0-18 with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at the Infectious Disease Hospital "Prof. Ivan Kirov"in Sofia, Bulgaria. Nearly 76% of the patients were <= 12 years old. In our study, at least one comorbidity was reported in 28.1% of the cases, with obesity being the most common one (8.9%). Less than 5% of children were transferred to an intensive care unit. We observed a statistically significant difference in the age groups, with children between 5 and 12 years old having a higher likelihood of requiring intensive care compared to other age groups. The median values of PaO2 and SatO2 were higher among patients admitted to the standard ward, while the values of granulocytes and C-reactive protein were higher among those transferred to the intensive care unit. Additionally, we identified 26 children who met the WHO case definition for MIS-C. Our study data supports the evidence of milder COVID-19 in children and young individuals as compared to adults. Older age groups were associated with higher incidence of both MIS-C and ICU admissions.Copyright © 2023 P. Velikov et al., published by Sciendo.

Particularities of hemostasis changes in COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19 infection is characterized by different clinical presentations. The thrombotic complications play the leading role in COVID-19 infection. SARS-CoV-2 virus can activate hemostasis at different levels: pulmonary tissue damage with subsequent plasma coagulation activation;local endothelial dysfunction and platelet activation during the course of the disease. Routine use of the anticoagulation treatment seems reasonable in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.Copyright © Creative Cardiology 2021.

Examining the frequency of endoscopic findings in patients with covid-19 with upper gastrointestinal bleeding referred to al-Zahra Hospital of Isfahan.

Background: Gastrointestinal bleeding is one of the consequences of COVID-19, which is associated with increased hospitalization and patient mortality. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of endoscopic findings and the outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized from September to December 2019 in Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan. Method(s): In this cross-sectional study, out of 5800 patients who were admitted to Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan from September to December 2019 due to COVID-19 (according to the positive PCR test result), 87 patients who underwent endoscopy due to upper gastrointestinal bleeding by a skilled gastroenterologist, were selected and studied. Demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, use of anticoagulants, and laboratory findings were studied and evaluated and finally, the disease was evaluated and compared based on endoscopic findings. Result(s): Based on the results obtained from this research, the patients with endoscopic lesions had higher average age (P=0.041), lower blood oxygen saturation percentage (P=0.028), and higher bleeding intensity (P=0.018). The frequency of using anticoagulant drugs in the group whose endoscopy results were abnormal was higher but insignificant. Hemoglobin, platelet, lymphocyte, and CRP levels were higher in the group whose endoscopy was normal, and NLR, LDH, and D-dimer levels were higher in the group whose endoscopy was abnormal (P<0.050). Three people (11.55%) from the group with normal endoscopy and 18 people (29.5%) from the group with abnormal endoscopy died, but the frequency of death was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.070). Conclusion(s): The findings of the present study showed that the COVID patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who had endoscopic lesions had significant differences in some characteristics such as age, bleeding intensity, and blood oxygen saturation percentage with patients with normal endoscopy. Also, the frequency of death in patients with endoscopic lesions was relatively higher. Therefore, COVID patients with gastrointestinal bleeding should undergo endoscopy as soon as possible and necessary measures should be taken to control and prevent gastrointestinal bleeding.Copyright © 2022 Tabesh et al. Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Integrated Lactate Is Improved with a Novel Pharmacologic Inducer of the Endogenous Cytoprotective Heat Shock Protein 70I Gga and Potential COVID Applications

Introduction: Lactate is a common biomarker used in multiple surgical subspecialties. No one has previously measured coronary sinus lactate reduction as a result of drug administration. We therefore tested the hypothesis that IV geranylgeranylacetone (GGA), a novel agent used to treat human peptic ulcer disease, would result in reduced coronary sinus lactate production. Method(s): New Zealand adult rabbits (N=5 each) received IV 50 mg/kg GGA 24 hours before intervention, which consisted of Langendorff perfusion, 30 min of global normothermic cardioplegic arrest, followed by reperfusion. Myocardial release of lactate was measured. HSP70 was quantified by western blot. Differences between GGA+ and GGA- groups pre- and post-ischemia were analyzed by unpaired t-tests. Result(s): In the GGA- group, lactate increased immediately at one minute and throughout the duration of reperfusion. However, in GGA+ hearts, lactate also increased at one min of reperfusion but then continued to decrease throughout the remainder of reperfusion. Lactate was significantly less at every time point of reperfusion in GGA+. Integrated lactate area was significantly less throughout reperfusion in GGA+. Conclusion(s): GGA induced caused a marked decrease in coronary sinus lactate release during reperfusion. Simultaneously intravenously GGA induced myocardial HSP70i and reduced myocardial damage. Further study of the effects and mechanisms involved is indicated. Application to other organs is useful as well. Heat shock proteins (HSPS) are also antithrombotic. Given the thrombotic nature of Covid, induction of HSPS may be beneficial in decreasing the cardiac thoracic and vascular complications of Covid and allowing faster resolution of this disease during to vascular complications.

Postnatal SARSCOV2 Infection in Neonates, Characteristics and Outcomes: An Observational Study

Background: Many aspects of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2) pandemic in 2019 have been unclear, especially in newborns, and reports of neonatal diseases are usually associated with perinatal infection. Objective(s): The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and para-clinical manifestations in newborns that contracted the infection after birth. Method(s): This observational research was conducted from October 2020 to March 2022 to examine postnatal SARSCoV2 infection in infants admitted to the NICU or neonatal ward at the Children's Medical Center in Tehran, Iran. Inclusion in the study was open to neonates who had positive RT-PCR results postnatally. Result(s): In total, 55 newborns were confirmed to have postnatal SARSCOV2. Fever was the most frequently observed symptom, with 35 (61%). Necrotizing enterocolitis was seen in 18% of neonates, and 30% of them were preterm. Neutropenia was seen in 34% of cases, with five cases having severe neutropenia. All neonates had a normal platelet count. Twenty percent of patients showed C-reactive protein higher than 6 mg/L. Two newborns had co-existing bacterial urinary tract infections. Our neonates didn't require antiviral, anticoagulant, or corticosteroid medications, and they recovered while receiving only supportive care. Everyone in the group of newborns was discharged without complications, and there were no deaths. Conclusion(s): The high rate of fever, high C-reactive protein, and neutropenia in SARSCoV2 neonates suggests that more observational research is needed to compare these symptoms to bacterial sepsis to avoid the overuse of antibiotics in these patients.Copyright © 2023, Author(s).

Effect of Anticoagulant Administration in patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 - A study from Lahore, Pakistan

Background: The recognition of the relationship between thromboembolism in COVID-19 and poor clinical outcomes led to the use of anticoagulants in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Aim(s): To determine the effects of anticoagulants in COVID-19 patients and to compare the effect of oral, subcutaneous, and combined anticoagulants on patient outcomes. Study design: Retrospective cohort study Place and duration: A private tertiary care hospital, in Lahore, from 1st April 2020 to 30 Sep 2020 Methodology: Data were collected from electronic and paper records of admitted patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 on PCR or with a radiological diagnosis of COVID-19. A total of 179 patients were included in the study, 172 were given anticoagulation, out of these, 74 were given oral anticoagulation, 73 were given subcutaneous and 24 were given combination of oral and subcutaneous anticoagulants. Result(s): Among 172 patients on anticoagulants, 41(23.8%) expired while 131(76.2%) recovered. Among 7(100%) patients on no anticoagulation, 1(14.3%) patient expired while 6(85.7%) recovered. 19(11%) patients on anticoagulation progressed towards the need for invasive ventilation while 152(89%) patients did not need invasive ventilation. Among patients on subcutaneous anticoagulants, 27(37%) expired while 46(63%) recovered. 8(33.3%) patients on combined anticoagulants expired while 16(66.7%) recovered. 6(8.1%) patients on oral anticoagulants expired while 68(91.9%) recovered. Conclusion(s): Anticoagulation improves the outcome of COVID-19 patients and oral anticoagulation is better than subcutaneous and combined anticoagulation.Copyright © 2023 Lahore Medical And Dental College. All rights reserved.

Surgical treatment of acute intestinal obstruction in the infectious department environment for covid-19 patients.

Surgical care in a mono-hospital for patients with COVID-19 leads to a number of organisational problems due to the lack of specialised departments. The article presents the experience of surgical treatment in a mono-hospital obtained from one and a half years of work in this mode. In total, approximately 400 surgeries were performed. The experience of treatment of 7 patients with acute intestinal obstruction has been summarised. In the abdominal cavity, a significant number of hematomas of varied localisation were found under the parietal and visceral peritoneum, as well as in the subcutaneous fat. This is possibly associated with anticoagulant therapy included in the treatment regimen for patients with COVID-19 according to the methodical recommendations by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. As an illustration, a successful case of treating COVID-19 patient with strangulated hernia of the abdominal white line complicated by acute intestinal obstruction is presented.Copyright © 2022, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University. All rights reserved.

Safety of Pharmacotherapy in COVID-19 Patients: A Literature Review.

The safety of COVID-19 pharmacotherapy is a relevant issue, first of all, because of the current lack of experience with using particular medicinal products and with off-label prescribing. The aim of the study was to analyse information on potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and their predictors in etiology- and pathogenesis-oriented COVID-19 therapy. According to literature data, the main clinically significant risk factors for COVID-19 patients to develop an ADR are the duration of their hospital stay, combined use of antivirals, polypharmacy, and their history of drug allergies. The most common adverse reactions to antivirals, to virus-neutralising antibodies, and to human anti-COVID-19 immunoglobulin and convalescent plasma are, respectively, gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders;gastrointestinal disorders, neurological disorders, and allergic reactions;and transfusion reactions (fever, chills, etc.). For pathogenesis-oriented therapy with systemic glucocorticosteroids, the most characteristic ADR is hyperglycaemia. Janus kinase inhibitors and interleukin inhibitors are most often associated with gastrointestinal disorders and hypertransaminasemia;neutropenia is also characteristic of a number of interleukin inhibitors. Haemostatic adverse reactions to anticoagulants depend on the patient's dosing regimen and condition. Drug-drug interactions are a common problem in COVID-19 treatment, with the combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir showing the largest number of significant interactions attributed to their pharmacokinetics. Currently, there is data on the role of pharmacogenetic biomarkers in the safety and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 therapy. Thus, to improve the safety of COVID-19 therapy, an integrated approach is needed that will take into account both the clinical, demographic, and pharmacogenetic predictors of ADRs and the risk of drug-drug interactions.Copyright © 2023 Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy. All rights reserved.

ID: 219407 The Cardiac Patient and Neuromodulation, When Anticoagulation Dictates the Intervention

Introduction: Patients with cardiac comorbidities present unique challenges for undergoing interventional pain procedures. Consensus guidelines on safe anticoagulation management are categorized by procedure, patient specific bleeding risk factors, and class of anticoagulation (Table 1, Table 2).1 Specifically, some procedures occur in close proximity to the spinal cord, require large gauge needles and styletted leads, while others are in compressible locations with minimal tissue disruption. Further, pain-induced hypercoagulation increases the risk of thrombo-vascular events.1 This accentuates the importance of interdisciplinary perioperative coordination with the prescribing cardiologist. Case: A 71-year-old male with past-medical-history of CABG, bilateral femoral-popliteal bypass, atrial fibrillation on apixaban and ticagrelor, and multiple cardiac stents presented with intermittent shooting axial back pain radiating to right buttock, lateral thigh, and calf, worsened with activity. MRI demonstrated thoracic myelomalacia, multi-level lumbar disc herniation, and moderate central canal stenosis. An initial multi-model treatment approach utilizing pharmacologic agents, physical therapy, ESI's, and RFA failed to alleviate symptoms. After extensive discussion with his cardiologist, he was scheduled for a three-day SCS trial. Ticagrelor and apixaban were held throughout the 3-day trial and for 5 and 3 days prior, respectively, while ASA was maintained. Successful trial with tip placement at T6 significantly improved function and pain scores (Figure 1). Upon planned percutaneous implant, the cardiologist recommended against surgical implantation and holding anticoagulation. Alternatively, the patient underwent bilateral lumbar medial branch PNS implant with sustained improvement in lower back symptoms. However, he contracted COVID, resulting in delayed lead explanation (>60 days) without complication. Conclusion(s): Interventional pain practice advisories are well established for anticoagulation use in the perioperative period.1,2 However, there is limited high-quality research on the appropriate length to hold anticoagulation prior to surgery for high thrombotic risk patients. Collegial decision making with the cardiologist was required to avoid deleterious procedural complications. However, they may be unfamiliar with the nuances between interventions or between trial and implant. Prospective studies have shown that low risk procedures, such as the PNS, may not require holding anticoagulants.3 Other case data has demonstrated post-SCS epidural hematoma with ASA use after being held for 1-week prior to surgery. Our patient was unable to undergo SCS implant and instead elected for a lower risk procedure with excellent efficacy. 4 However, delayed PNS lead extraction due to COVID19 hospitalization presented further risk of infection and lead fracture.5 PNS may prove to be an appropriate treatment option for patients who are anticoagulated and are not SCS candidates. Disclosure: Elliot Klein, MD,MPH: None, Clarence Kong, MD: None, Shawn Sidharthan, MD: None, Peter Lascarides, DO: None, Yili Huang, DO: NoneCopyright © 2023

THE IMPACT of PRIOR ANTITHROMBOTIC USE on THROMBOEMBOLIC EVENTS in PATIENTS with CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE and SEVERE COVID-19 INFECTION

Objective: Our objective in this study is to determine the predictive factors of thromboembolic complications in patients with previous heart disease and severe covid-19 infection and the impact of previous use of antithrombotic drugs on protection against these complications. Method(s): We conducted a single-center retrospective study of 158 patients with heart disease admitted to an intensive care unit for severe SARS-COV-2 infection. To determine the predictive factors, we used a logistic regression analysis. Result(s): Out of 158 patients, 22 were complicated by a thromboembolic event, i.e. 13.9%, mean age of our population was 64.03 (SD = 15.27), with a male predominance of 98 (62%), For the predictive factors of thromboembolic complications, and after multivariate analysis, we find the duration of hospitalization with (OR=0.92 ;95%CI (0.863 - 0.983), p=0.014, previous use of anti-thrombotic drugs as a protective factor with ( OR=0.288, 95%CI (0.091 - 0.911), p=0.034 for anti-platelet agents ) and ( OR=0, 322, 95%CI (0.131 - 0.851), p=0.021) for anti-coagulants (Figure1), and finally thrombocytopenia at admission as a risk factor ( OR=4.58 95%CI (1.2 - 10.627), p=0.021). D-dimer was not detected as a risk factor, and this can be explained by the characteristics of our population. Although the previous use of anti-thrombotic drugs protects against thrombo-embolic complications during severe infection, there was no benefit in terms of mortality (Figure2). Conclusion(s): Prior use of antithrombotic drugs is a protective factor against thromboembolic complications in patients with a history of heart disease but has no effect on mortality.

Clinical evolution of patients with AF and diabetes mellitus in the COVID-19 pandemic. REFADI Registry

Introduction and objectives: To analyze the evolution of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes in the mid-term follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic and to describe its impact on this population. Method(s): Multicenter and prospective registry that included patients with AF and diabetes attended in cardiology clinics. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the variables associated with the occurrence of clinical events and mortality. Recruitment was performed in February-December 2019. Result(s): The evolution of 633 patients, 96,2% of those included in the REFADI registry with a median follow-up of 835 days was analyzed (mean age 73.8 +/- 8.5 years, 54.3% male, CHA2DS2-VASc 4,34 +/- 1,4, HAS-BLED 2,47 +/- 0,96) were analyzed. The proportion of anticoagulated patients remained constant (95.6% vs 94.5%;P = .24). There was a decrease in the prescription of vitamin K antagonists (from 31.4% to 19.7%;P < .01), and an increase in the use of direct anticoagulants (from 62.0% to 70.3%;P < .01). During the follow-up there was an increase in the prescription of SGLT2 inhibitors (from 20.0% to 25.5%;P < .01) and GLP1 agonists (from 4.2% to 9.1%;P < .01). During this period, 17.2% of patients died, the majority from cardiovascular causes, 6.4% from COVID-19, 2.8% from stroke, and 1.8% from hemorrhage. Older age, lower ejection fraction, lower hemoglobin levels, and especially lower direct anticoagulants prescription were associated with mortality. Conclusion(s): Patients with AF and diabetes have a high thromboembolic risk and a high risk of developing complications, especially of cardiovascular origin.Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Espanola de Cardiologia

COVID-19 IN A PATIENT WITH GRANULOMATOSIS WITH POLYANGIITIS: MANAGEMENT TACTICS

Patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) cause extreme alertness during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, associated with many factors: the initial damage to the respiratory system (upper respiratory tract, lungs) and kidneys, immunosuppressive treatments, difficult prognosis of COVID-19 with the risk of AAV exacerbation. We present a clinical case of a moderate COVID-19 in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, who received anti-B cell therapy with rituximab (RTX) for a long time. Coronavirus pneumonia developed one year after RTX, while B-lymphocyte depletion persisted. In order to achieve an adequate antiviral immune response and prevent hyperinflammation, treatment was carried out with antiviral drugs, anticoagulants, convalescent plasma, human normal immunoglobulin, and interleukin-6 antagonist tocilizumab. Possible predictors of severe COVID-19 in patients with AAV are discussed.Copyright © 2023 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.

An Observational Study of COVID-19 Infection in Pregnant Women at a Tertiary Care Center

Background: COVID-19 infection is a disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The manifestations, effects, and severity of the infection are varied in different waves, especially during pregnancy. Material(s) and Method(s): The study was conducted in two equal time periods during the first and second waves. During the first wave, the period of study was between June and August 2020 corresponding to the peak of the first wave, and in the second wave, the study period was between May and July 2021 corresponding to the peak of the second wave. Result(s): A total of 3,791 pregnant women was screened for COVID-19 infection during the first wave and second wave, the pregnant mothers with COVID-19 positive were 4.2 (n = 163) and 5.1% (n = 191), respectively. Around 60% were antenatal mothers and 37% were postnatal mothers who were COVID-19-positive. The predominant age group affected was between 20 and 25 years of age. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), gestational hypertension, anemia, previous lower segment cesarean section (LSCS), postdated pregnancy, and past history of infertility were the high-risk factors observed during the study. Hypoxia was observed in 15% of patients in the second wave. About 49.7% (n = 95) of the COVID-19-positive mothers in the second wave required steroids, anticoagulants, and antiviral drugs. Conclusion(s): The incidence of COVID-19 infection was mild and asymptomatic during the first wave and symptomatic as well as with complications during the second wave. The disease severity, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, duration of stay, LSCS delivery, and need for antivirals, anticoagulants, and steroids were more during the second wave of COVID-19.Copyright © The Author(s). 2023.

COVID-19: The efficacy and safety of anticoagulant, glucocorticosteroid therapy and metabolic

Objective: assessment of the efficacy and safety of the use of anticoagulant, glucocorticosteroid, metabolic therapy in patients with COVID-19 at the inpatient stage of treatment. Material and methods. In February 2021, a prospective, randomized, single-center, continuous comparative study was organized on the basis of the Gomel City Clinical Hospital No. 3, which included 827 patients with moderate and severe clinical course of COVID-19. Results. Stratification of the risks of an unfavorable outcome in patients with moderate and severe clinical course of COVID-19 made it possible to optimize treatment, with the selection of optimal doses of anticoagulant and glucocorticosteroid therapy, which led to an increase in patient survival. A high level of blood lactate reflects the degree of damage to the lung tissue, the severity of the course of the disease and requires an increase in the dose of anticoagulant therapy. The use of thiotriazoline effectively reduces the level of lactate, which makes it possible to restore the energy balance of the cell. Conclusion. The use of therapeutic (intermediate) doses of anticoagulant and optimal glucorticosteroid therapy in patients at high risk of poor outcomes with moderate and severe clinical course of COVID-19, can increase the survival rate from 82.1 to 96.8%, p<0.0001. The appointment of anticoagulant therapy was complicated by "minor" bleeding in 2.13% in the main group, in 2.11% in the control group, p>0.05, and the use of glucocorticosteroids was complicated by newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (2.13% in the main group, 1.81% in the control group, p>0.05), which allows us to consider the therapy used is safe. The use of the metabolic, antioxidant agent thiotriazoline in patients with an LDH level of more than 800 U/L and with a high risk of an unfavorable outcome led to a decrease in LDH within five days of treatment by 447.9 U/L in the main group compared with the control group by 124.0 U/L (p=0.0001), which was accompanied by an improvement in the general condition, increased physical activity, and an earlier start of rehabilitation.Copyright © 2022 by the authors.

IgM Multiple Myeloma Presenting With Diarrhea

Introduction: IgM Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a rare subtype of MM consisting of <1% cases of MM. It is distinguished from Waldenstrom Macroglobinemia, which also produces IgM, by the absence of somatic mutation MYD88. We present a patient with a chief complaint of diarrhea which unknowingly led to his hematological diagnosis Case Description/Methods: A 64 year old male with RA-SLE overlap syndrome on steroids, and recent COVID19 pneumonia, had presented with 5 episodes of watery diarrhea every day and 40 Ib weight loss within 2 months. CT revealed small bowel enteritis and stool studies, including C. diff, cultures, ova and parasites were negative. Diarrhea persisted despite antibiotics, therefore an EGD and Colonoscopy were performed which showed duodenal lymphangiectasia and a normal colon. Duodenal biopsy revealed eosinophilic deposits in the villous lamina propria which stained for IgM and stained negative under congo red ruling out amyloidosis. SPEP and a bone marrow biopsy revealed monoclonal IgMspikes and plasma cells in the bone marrow suggesting MMalong with a co-existing population of CLL. Next-generation sequencing was negative forMYD88, supporting IgM MM instead of Waldenstrom. He developed a protein-losing enteropathy with dramatic hypoalbuminemia (albumin 0.9) and lower extremity edema and DVTs. He was started on chemotherapy and frequent albumin infusions. His diarrhea completely resolved, however not in time, as his other medical comorbidities lagged behind and he developed anasarca and continued to deteriorate. Discussion(s): Plasma cell dyscrasias such as IgM MM or more commonly Waldenstrom have rarely been reported to cause GI symptoms. GI involvement can include direct GI infiltration of plasma cells, IgM deposition, or the finding of a plasmacytoma. It has been speculated that IgM deposits can lead to interstitial viscosity and obstructive lymphangiectasia leading to diarrhea and a protein-losing enteropathy as in our patient. Protein loss has led him to have hypoalbuminemia and possibly loss of antithrombotic proteins that have caused DVTs. Few case reports have suggested that treating the underlying cause with chemotherapy stops diarrhea entirely. Although our patient's diarrhea ceased, we believe that it was not in time for him to entirely recover from the later complications of the disease. We hope that this case can help clinicians to attempt prompt treatment of patients when they find GI specimens showing IgM deposits and they suspect a plasma cell dyscrasia.

Clinical experience of Raphamin therapy in outpatients after hospital treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia

Post-infectious immunosuppression may cause repeated hospitalization after COVID-19 pneumonia. The results of the observational study of the Raphamin use for immunotherapy in the recovery period of COVID-19 pneumonia are presented. Aim(s): to estimate efficiency of Rafamin usage in patients who have completed the course of inpatient treatment for coronavirus pneumonia. Material and methods. Thirty patients aged 18 to 80 years after hospital treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia were included and randomized into 2 groups (1: 1). All patients received anticoagulants, antioxidants, metabolic drugs. Patients of the 1st group (n=15) were additionally prescribed Raphamin for 5 days. The primary endpoint was the number of repeated hospitalizations due to consequences of COVID-19 and/or new cases of acute respiratory infection for 28 days of follow-up. In addition, dynamic of immune and inflammatory markers (absolute lymphocyte count, C-reactive protein), proportion of patients with immune dysregulation, and duration of symptoms associated with COVID-19 were assessed. Results. The number of hospitalized patients in group 1 was 0 (vs 5 in group 2, p=0.0421). Study therapy reduced the risk of repeated hospitalizations in 1.44 times [relative risk 1.44;95% confidence interval 0.91-2.28];duration of breathlessness decreased from 24.5 to 15.3 days (p=0.0108), and duration of fatigue reduced from 23.6 to 16.8 days (p=0.0452). The proportion of patients with immune markers normalization was 2 times higher than in the comparison group on 14 day of observation. Conclusion. The immunomodulatory therapy may be recommended during the recovery period of COVID-19 pneumonia.Copyright © Eco-Vector, 2022.

A randomized controlled trial to investigate the use of acute coronary syndrome therapy in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: the COVID-19 Acute Coronary Syndrome trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 suffer thrombotic complications. Risk factors for poor outcomes are shared with coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of an acute coronary syndrome regimen in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and coronary disease risk factors. METHODS: A randomized controlled, open-label trial across acute hospitals (United Kingdom and Brazil) added aspirin, clopidogrel, low-dose rivaroxaban, atorvastatin, and omeprazole to standard care for 28 days. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes were 30-day mortality and bleeding. The key secondary outcome was a daily clinical status (at home, in hospital, on intensive therapy unit admission, or death). RESULTS: Three hundred twenty patients from 9 centers were randomized. The trial terminated early due to low recruitment. At 30 days, there was no significant difference in mortality (intervention vs control, 11.5% vs 15%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.38-1.41; p = .355). Significant bleeds were infrequent and were not significantly different between the arms (intervention vs control, 1.9% vs 1.9%; p > .999). Using a Bayesian Markov longitudinal ordinal model, it was 93% probable that intervention arm participants were more likely to transition to a better clinical state each day (OR, 1.46; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.88-2.37; Pr [beta > 0], 93%; adjusted OR, 1.50; 95% CrI, 0.91-2.45; Pr [beta > 0], 95%) and median time to discharge to home was 2 days shorter (95% CrI, -4 to 0; 2% probability that it was worse). CONCLUSION: Acute coronary syndrome treatment regimen was associated with a reduction in the length of hospital stay without an excess in major bleeding. A larger trial is needed to evaluate mortality.

A case report overlapped vaccine and COVID-19 in disseminated atherosclerosis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a part of our lives now and we have no more effective way of coping than a vaccine. COVID-19 is a disease that causes severe thrombosis outside the respiratory tract. Vaccines also protect us in this respect, but in some rare cases, thrombosis has been found to develop after vaccination (much less frequently than COVID-19). What was interesting in our case was that it showed how a disaster could happen under three factors that predispose to thrombosis. A 65-year-old female patient with disseminated atherosclerosis was admitted to the intensive care unit with complaints of dyspnea and dysphasia. In the evening of the day, the patient had the vaccination 2 weeks ago, she had active COVID-19. On examination, lower extremity pulses could not be detected. The patient's imaging and blood tests were performed. Multiple complications such as embolic stroke, venous and arterial thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and pericarditis were observed in the patient. This case may give consideration to anticoagulant therapy studies. We give effective anticoagulant therapy in the presence of COVID-19 in patients at risk of thrombosis. Can anticoagulant therapy be considered after vaccination in patients at risk of thrombosis such as disseminated atherosclerosis?